organizations interested in making sure that accused persons have a trial of their peers often compare the distribution of jurors by age, education, and other socioeconomic variables. one such study in a large southern county provided the following information on the ages of 1,000 jurors and the age distribution countywide. Soc. Age 21-40 41-50 51-60 Over 60 Total 399 212 Number of jurors Age % countywide 231 158 1,000 42.1 22.9 15.7 19.3 100 a. Display the above data using appropriate graphs. b. Is this significant evidence of a difference between the age distribution of jurors and the countywide age distribution? c. Does there appear to be an age bias in the selection of jurors?

Question

contestada

Respuesta :

good job

varshamittal029 varshamittal029 · Answer 1 · 2022-12-16T20:10:31+01:00

Yes, it is significant evidence of a difference between the age distribution of jurors and the countrywide age distribution.

No, there is no age bias in the selection of jurors.

P Oi Ei ( Oi-Ei) ^2/Ei

0.421 399 421 1.149643705

0.229 231 229 0.017467249

0.157 158 157 0.006369427

0.193 193 193 1.870466321

1 1000 1000 3.043946702

The above can be represented in graphs.

Now,

Ei = n × pi

TS = 3.04394672

From TS < value

Value (7.81472)

We fail to reject the null hypothesis at 5% value of significance

No, there is no age bias in the selection of jurors.

To know more about Distribution, refer to:

http://brainly.com/question/4679134

#SPJ4