BIJDZ5071 BIJDZ5071
  • 10-09-2017
  • Social Studies
contestada

One who acts in-a manner that is very annoying, but not threatening, may be liable for the infliction of emotional distress.

Respuesta :

SeoJoon15
SeoJoon15 SeoJoon15
  • 21-09-2017
The answer is no, the person who acts in a manner that is very annoying but not threatening can't be liable for the infliction of emotional distress because in order to inflict emotional distress, the person should be threatening and not just plainly annoying towards others.
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Which equation could help you solve 32-4?
what is the greatest possible product of a 3 - digit number and a 1 - digit number explain how you know
If the diagonal of a square is 12 centimeters, the area of the square is
You all (plural, informal, spain, all females.)
What is the answer to this definition? To place a dot at the point named by an ordered pair.?
How much larger or smaller is the 3 in the number labeled A than the 3 in the number labeled B? A 4.632. B 67.493
Please help who are indigenous populations of central america? a. the native people of the region b. the rural poor c. the subsistence farmers d. the wealth
In a constitutional monarchy, the king or queen _____.
Is the graph of a function rule that relates a squares area to its side length continuous or discrete? Explain
Which values of x satisfy the inequality
good job